May 9, 2025
The daunting thing can be the consideration of consistency
as an imperative. I wonder if that notion doesn’t arise from the subtextual
branding of everything that enters our consciousness, or the similarly
capitalist idea that an entity has to grow exponentially from its own
foundations, without regard for tangential thinking or discursive breaks or the
sudden onset of boredom or the multifarious interventions of life. Like in
order to be credible you have to be credibly one thing or justify within the vernacular
of that one thing your excursions into fancy or wonder or retreat. Return to
your expectation of yourself. Artist as
monolith, art as product hustled through the anticipation of its witness or
consumption.
I guess what I’m saying is I hope to intentionally act in
opposition to a unifying principle. It would be ideal if I didn’t even like
half the things I devise half the time. I want the antagonisms of discovery
without the murder of their dissection, to borrow from Wordsworth.
If all the tyrannical things afoot don’t teach us the
dangers of totality, I don’t know what will. So I am a purposively anti-total
human with decidedly anti-totalizing impressions to things that I find
infinitely of interest. & I’ve dwelt enough in the echo of my own voice
that I will expect it to return to me unrhymed. Maybe just any old thought
worth my own time can end up here, open to harmony or dissent.
It’s been a while.
Comments