May 9, 2025

 

The daunting thing can be the consideration of consistency as an imperative. I wonder if that notion doesn’t arise from the subtextual branding of everything that enters our consciousness, or the similarly capitalist idea that an entity has to grow exponentially from its own foundations, without regard for tangential thinking or discursive breaks or the sudden onset of boredom or the multifarious interventions of life. Like in order to be credible you have to be credibly one thing or justify within the vernacular of that one thing your excursions into fancy or wonder or retreat. Return to your expectation of  yourself. Artist as monolith, art as product hustled through the anticipation of its witness or consumption.

I guess what I’m saying is I hope to intentionally act in opposition to a unifying principle. It would be ideal if I didn’t even like half the things I devise half the time. I want the antagonisms of discovery without the murder of their dissection, to borrow from Wordsworth.

If all the tyrannical things afoot don’t teach us the dangers of totality, I don’t know what will. So I am a purposively anti-total human with decidedly anti-totalizing impressions to things that I find infinitely of interest. & I’ve dwelt enough in the echo of my own voice that I will expect it to return to me unrhymed. Maybe just any old thought worth my own time can end up here, open to harmony or dissent.

It’s been a while.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Bit More From Bettles

Dogs First

Map & Shadow